<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I can haz Nom Nom Nom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/</link>
	<description>Feral Druids in World of Warcraft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:32:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boobah</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37443</link>
		<dc:creator>Boobah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Maul on the GCD and (proposed) burning up to 45 rage a pop it&#039;ll get used a lot less; on the other hand, it&#039;ll almost certainly hit much harder than it does now.  I&#039;d be looking at sharpened claws for the Mangle buff anyways, though.

Speaking of Mangle and the GCD, for bears (who I expect to remain GCD locked) I can&#039;t see a whole lot of use for an improved Mangle that doesn&#039;t reduce its cooldown to the next GCD; currently it&#039;s an all or nothing talent as I see it, and that doesn&#039;t look to change.

Fury Swipes looks lackluster all around; as described it triggers only on auto attacks, and with the cooldown when it does occur your next two (or three if you&#039;re sporting 25% or more haste) attacks don&#039;t have any chance to proc it.  If it instead triggered on any melee strike, the way Sword Specialization does, it&#039;d be more worthwhile since you could trigger it more-or-less every six seconds swiping the mob pile.  On the other hand, if it triggers a true auto attack (ie, one which generates rage, unlike Sword Specialization) it could be kinda nice in a world where you can drop half your rage bar in one global.

Pulverize appears to be Blizzard&#039;s answer to keeping Swipe completely out of the bear single-target rotation.  Swipe was only ever used when Lacerate was at five stacks and didn&#039;t need refreshing; now you&#039;ll have Maul burning some of those Swipe GCDs, and Pulverize resetting everything right around the time you rebuild your five-stack.  This leads me to think there won&#039;t be a glyph to keep the Lacerates ticking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Maul on the GCD and (proposed) burning up to 45 rage a pop it&#8217;ll get used a lot less; on the other hand, it&#8217;ll almost certainly hit much harder than it does now.  I&#8217;d be looking at sharpened claws for the Mangle buff anyways, though.</p>
<p>Speaking of Mangle and the GCD, for bears (who I expect to remain GCD locked) I can&#8217;t see a whole lot of use for an improved Mangle that doesn&#8217;t reduce its cooldown to the next GCD; currently it&#8217;s an all or nothing talent as I see it, and that doesn&#8217;t look to change.</p>
<p>Fury Swipes looks lackluster all around; as described it triggers only on auto attacks, and with the cooldown when it does occur your next two (or three if you&#8217;re sporting 25% or more haste) attacks don&#8217;t have any chance to proc it.  If it instead triggered on any melee strike, the way Sword Specialization does, it&#8217;d be more worthwhile since you could trigger it more-or-less every six seconds swiping the mob pile.  On the other hand, if it triggers a true auto attack (ie, one which generates rage, unlike Sword Specialization) it could be kinda nice in a world where you can drop half your rage bar in one global.</p>
<p>Pulverize appears to be Blizzard&#8217;s answer to keeping Swipe completely out of the bear single-target rotation.  Swipe was only ever used when Lacerate was at five stacks and didn&#8217;t need refreshing; now you&#8217;ll have Maul burning some of those Swipe GCDs, and Pulverize resetting everything right around the time you rebuild your five-stack.  This leads me to think there won&#8217;t be a glyph to keep the Lacerates ticking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athenrein</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37206</link>
		<dc:creator>Athenrein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a kitty, haven&#039;t tanked in ages, besides the occasional respec to solo BC dungeons. But I agree that the new trees look promising. Fury Swipes will be nice for cats because OOC procs make it easier to build combo points and keep everything running smoothly. And I&#039;m one of the druids who will be quite sad if Nom Nom Nom is not the final name for a pretty neat talent.

Pulverize also sounds pretty great. I like abilities that play off of other abilities. It&#039;s really satisfying to set everything up and then get a nice payoff. And who doesn&#039;t like more crits?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a kitty, haven&#8217;t tanked in ages, besides the occasional respec to solo BC dungeons. But I agree that the new trees look promising. Fury Swipes will be nice for cats because OOC procs make it easier to build combo points and keep everything running smoothly. And I&#8217;m one of the druids who will be quite sad if Nom Nom Nom is not the final name for a pretty neat talent.</p>
<p>Pulverize also sounds pretty great. I like abilities that play off of other abilities. It&#8217;s really satisfying to set everything up and then get a nice payoff. And who doesn&#8217;t like more crits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37133</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have made it so i now look forward to the cataclysm changes. Usually I cant stand it cause my other main, Disc Priest, usually gets screwed or one of them gets screwed. But reading your opinion on the talents yeah I look forward to pulverize! I still think Disc Priests are getting screwed because Blizzard doesnt want us using shield as much... but I say &quot;pfft! Shield is part of my healing rotation&quot;.

I would have like an extra aggro effect from being in bear form, similar to the pallies Righteous Fury. Im finding that single target I can do well to hold aggro but sometimes I feel that everyone else can rip aggro away from me sooo easily...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have made it so i now look forward to the cataclysm changes. Usually I cant stand it cause my other main, Disc Priest, usually gets screwed or one of them gets screwed. But reading your opinion on the talents yeah I look forward to pulverize! I still think Disc Priests are getting screwed because Blizzard doesnt want us using shield as much&#8230; but I say &#8220;pfft! Shield is part of my healing rotation&#8221;.</p>
<p>I would have like an extra aggro effect from being in bear form, similar to the pallies Righteous Fury. Im finding that single target I can do well to hold aggro but sometimes I feel that everyone else can rip aggro away from me sooo easily&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javan</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37091</link>
		<dc:creator>Javan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B3 - I respect that you&#039;re not a raider, but the reason I pointed out about Infected Wounds really does stem from your previous post:

    * Keep all aggro from mobs on me instead of the team.
    * Regain lost aggro as quickly as possible to keep mobs from interfering with other members of the team.
    * Be as difficult to hurt as possible to ease the strain on the Healer to keep me alive through a fight.
    * Be as difficult to hurt as possible to ease the strain on the DPS to kill all mobs before I and the Healer are overwhelmed. 

Those last 2 points, Infected Wounds directly plays into.  

Even in 5-mans or soloing.  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B3 &#8211; I respect that you&#8217;re not a raider, but the reason I pointed out about Infected Wounds really does stem from your previous post:</p>
<p>    * Keep all aggro from mobs on me instead of the team.<br />
    * Regain lost aggro as quickly as possible to keep mobs from interfering with other members of the team.<br />
    * Be as difficult to hurt as possible to ease the strain on the Healer to keep me alive through a fight.<br />
    * Be as difficult to hurt as possible to ease the strain on the DPS to kill all mobs before I and the Healer are overwhelmed. </p>
<p>Those last 2 points, Infected Wounds directly plays into.  </p>
<p>Even in 5-mans or soloing.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbearbutt</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37083</link>
		<dc:creator>bigbearbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of my pet peeves. Some comments never get approved, simply because of the way things are phrased as being some kind of &quot;either/or&quot; situation.

I don&#039;t tank raids. I run Heroics and normals. I&#039;ve never written for serious raiders, and I never will. I have yet to meet main tank raiders that don&#039;t eventually get into a &quot;this is what *you* must do&quot; mentality, based on the assumption that the only thing worth discussing is raiding. As if that was the only level of content of any importance, and everyone should just understand that. 

I don&#039;t write that way, because I am well aware that there is a lot more to the game than raiding progression, and there is a lot more to tank gear and talent choices than what is &quot;best&quot; for raiding. 

If raiding is where you&#039;re at, then Elitist Jerks is your one stop shop for all Bear tank raiding discussion. 

I invite and welcome people to comment here, I always have. But there is a big difference to me between comments based on the format of &quot;This is what I do, because this is what my goals are when I am tanking, and if your goals are the same, this may work well for you for these specific reasons&quot;, and what I actually get a lot of, which is a binary solution set presented as &quot;You posted your thing, and I don&#039;t agree with you/I think you&#039;re wrong, this is what is right.&quot;

There are more ways than one to gear and spec, based on your gear availability, the content you intend to run, and your goals while running that content. If you run with all random strangers, your choices could be drastically different than if you play with reliable friends that don&#039;t have their heads up their butts.

Maybe the core problem here is, I offered my own opinion on what I was intending to do, for me, based on my content goals for Cataclysm, assuming things stayed the same basic shape. But I didn&#039;t specify in the first place WHAT those goals of mine were, what considerations I had when making my choices. I just went through the descriptions blind, musing on what I thought might work for me and why. I didn&#039;t provide a frame of reference.

Regardless, if you&#039;re first thought when wanting to post a comment is to correct me and put me in my place, hows about you take a step back, and rephrase things so that what you&#039;re doing is presenting your opinions based on your own goals in the game, so that other readers can match up what you intend to do with what THEY intend to do, and pay attention to your advice for those reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of my pet peeves. Some comments never get approved, simply because of the way things are phrased as being some kind of &#8220;either/or&#8221; situation.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t tank raids. I run Heroics and normals. I&#8217;ve never written for serious raiders, and I never will. I have yet to meet main tank raiders that don&#8217;t eventually get into a &#8220;this is what *you* must do&#8221; mentality, based on the assumption that the only thing worth discussing is raiding. As if that was the only level of content of any importance, and everyone should just understand that. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t write that way, because I am well aware that there is a lot more to the game than raiding progression, and there is a lot more to tank gear and talent choices than what is &#8220;best&#8221; for raiding. </p>
<p>If raiding is where you&#8217;re at, then Elitist Jerks is your one stop shop for all Bear tank raiding discussion. </p>
<p>I invite and welcome people to comment here, I always have. But there is a big difference to me between comments based on the format of &#8220;This is what I do, because this is what my goals are when I am tanking, and if your goals are the same, this may work well for you for these specific reasons&#8221;, and what I actually get a lot of, which is a binary solution set presented as &#8220;You posted your thing, and I don&#8217;t agree with you/I think you&#8217;re wrong, this is what is right.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are more ways than one to gear and spec, based on your gear availability, the content you intend to run, and your goals while running that content. If you run with all random strangers, your choices could be drastically different than if you play with reliable friends that don&#8217;t have their heads up their butts.</p>
<p>Maybe the core problem here is, I offered my own opinion on what I was intending to do, for me, based on my content goals for Cataclysm, assuming things stayed the same basic shape. But I didn&#8217;t specify in the first place WHAT those goals of mine were, what considerations I had when making my choices. I just went through the descriptions blind, musing on what I thought might work for me and why. I didn&#8217;t provide a frame of reference.</p>
<p>Regardless, if you&#8217;re first thought when wanting to post a comment is to correct me and put me in my place, hows about you take a step back, and rephrase things so that what you&#8217;re doing is presenting your opinions based on your own goals in the game, so that other readers can match up what you intend to do with what THEY intend to do, and pay attention to your advice for those reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honorshammer</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37078</link>
		<dc:creator>honorshammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see infected wounds as a core tanking talent and not optional. Each tanking class has a melee slow and bosses damage is balanced with the idea that the debuff is there. 

You seem to value threat over survivability. You might have a strong reason for that, but I disagree. As tanks, our first job is survival. If you are light on threat, dos can back off. If you are light on survival, the bosses will show you no such courtesy.  I think you are doing a disservice to the raid by skipping IF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see infected wounds as a core tanking talent and not optional. Each tanking class has a melee slow and bosses damage is balanced with the idea that the debuff is there. </p>
<p>You seem to value threat over survivability. You might have a strong reason for that, but I disagree. As tanks, our first job is survival. If you are light on threat, dos can back off. If you are light on survival, the bosses will show you no such courtesy.  I think you are doing a disservice to the raid by skipping IF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fangtastic</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37077</link>
		<dc:creator>Fangtastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing that stands out to me is that the new feral ability stampeding roar is not mentioned in the feral talent tree at all. 

I wonder if that means all druids will have access to it (by shifting into a feral form)? 

Feral looks like its getting a nice dose of polish. Though cat and bear talents seem to be diverging, with stat simplification perhaps it will be very easy to build a shared bear/cat set. What I plan is, make the bear the &quot;main&quot; and if I get a nice upgrade to a piece, change enchants and gems on the old piece to make it a cat piece.

Must level a troll owl too, 100% conversion of spirit to hit means great gear synergy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that stands out to me is that the new feral ability stampeding roar is not mentioned in the feral talent tree at all. </p>
<p>I wonder if that means all druids will have access to it (by shifting into a feral form)? </p>
<p>Feral looks like its getting a nice dose of polish. Though cat and bear talents seem to be diverging, with stat simplification perhaps it will be very easy to build a shared bear/cat set. What I plan is, make the bear the &#8220;main&#8221; and if I get a nice upgrade to a piece, change enchants and gems on the old piece to make it a cat piece.</p>
<p>Must level a troll owl too, 100% conversion of spirit to hit means great gear synergy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimizar</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37063</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimizar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, good point - I forgot about the internal cooldown on the ability (and rereading the main post, I see you did make it clear that this talent has potential as a decent raiding talent where the longer boss fights would give it a chance to shine).

The cumulative effect over a long fight is gonna be fairly complicated to figure out though. Ah well, I&#039;m sure EJ will have it covered once the talent trees stabilise towards the end of the beta.

Although you do raise another issue - calling the talent &quot;Fury Swipes&quot; when it has currently nothing to do with our &quot;Swipe&quot; ability is needlessly confusing :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good point &#8211; I forgot about the internal cooldown on the ability (and rereading the main post, I see you did make it clear that this talent has potential as a decent raiding talent where the longer boss fights would give it a chance to shine).</p>
<p>The cumulative effect over a long fight is gonna be fairly complicated to figure out though. Ah well, I&#8217;m sure EJ will have it covered once the talent trees stabilise towards the end of the beta.</p>
<p>Although you do raise another issue &#8211; calling the talent &#8220;Fury Swipes&#8221; when it has currently nothing to do with our &#8220;Swipe&#8221; ability is needlessly confusing :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaboomski</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37038</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaboomski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hadn&#039;t looked into the new druid talents yet, but you manage to give a nice talent-by-talent analysis. I have a lowbie bear tank now, but I&#039;m thinking of getting her up to 80 before Cataclysm. Sounds like loads of fun to me!

On a side not, my wife plays a Resto/Feral druid and I play a Holy/Retribution paladin. Awesome combination to duo almost any 5 man dungeon with. No healing required thanks to both Improved LotP and Divine Storm/Judgement of Light. Gotta love bears! My paladin feels so squishy next to her :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t looked into the new druid talents yet, but you manage to give a nice talent-by-talent analysis. I have a lowbie bear tank now, but I&#8217;m thinking of getting her up to 80 before Cataclysm. Sounds like loads of fun to me!</p>
<p>On a side not, my wife plays a Resto/Feral druid and I play a Holy/Retribution paladin. Awesome combination to duo almost any 5 man dungeon with. No healing required thanks to both Improved LotP and Divine Storm/Judgement of Light. Gotta love bears! My paladin feels so squishy next to her :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venthos</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/06/10/i-can-haz-nom-nom-nom/comment-page-1/#comment-37034</link>
		<dc:creator>Venthos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3134#comment-37034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something to note is that the trees aren&#039;t fully finalized, just finished to the point they felt like they could show them. I don&#039;t know why they didn&#039;t make a sticky about that, though.

Like stated above, Demoralizing Roar was said that it was going to be changed to a damage reduction, rather than AP reduction, so Feral Aggression could merit another run through after they finalize the trees.

The only other thing I really saw was that you mentioned possibly taking a point out of King of the Jungle. However, it looks like it might be tied to Primal Madness, so... yeah.

These previews are like delicious odors wafting from the kitchen, and we&#039;re salivating out at the table trying not to eat too much bread. So good, and yet just shy of being filling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something to note is that the trees aren&#8217;t fully finalized, just finished to the point they felt like they could show them. I don&#8217;t know why they didn&#8217;t make a sticky about that, though.</p>
<p>Like stated above, Demoralizing Roar was said that it was going to be changed to a damage reduction, rather than AP reduction, so Feral Aggression could merit another run through after they finalize the trees.</p>
<p>The only other thing I really saw was that you mentioned possibly taking a point out of King of the Jungle. However, it looks like it might be tied to Primal Madness, so&#8230; yeah.</p>
<p>These previews are like delicious odors wafting from the kitchen, and we&#8217;re salivating out at the table trying not to eat too much bread. So good, and yet just shy of being filling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
