<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing about reading genres</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/</link>
	<description>Feral Druids in World of Warcraft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HerrDrache</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41367</link>
		<dc:creator>HerrDrache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Books!!! I grew up with books - probably too many, and it probably started the downward spiral of me needing ever-stronger glasses. I&#039;m not too fond of labels myself, as long as it&#039;s glaringly obvious: Space-ships go to sci-fi, magic swords and dragons go to fantasy, &quot;Memoirs of the Last 5 Presidents&quot; go either to fiction or horror :P Thing is, I &quot;need&quot; some kind of label, just to be able to find my books again. Sure, *I* sort them, and I know where the &quot;overlap&quot; area is, too - but it helps finding that &quot;Whatchamma-geddon by Arthur or Gene somethingorother!&quot;

As to e-books, and e-readings, I&#039;m sorry, I&#039;m too paranoid. If it&#039;s on paper, you can&#039;t mess with it. I&#039;d like to be able to read the exact same story 10 years from now that I read 10 years ago. Don&#039;t change the words due to some political correctness stuff. West Side Story: the song contains the word &quot;gay&quot;, I don&#039;t care what it means today, I know what it meant back then, and don&#039;t you dare change it because of whatever!

Perhaps I read too much Orwell when I was too young :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Books!!! I grew up with books &#8211; probably too many, and it probably started the downward spiral of me needing ever-stronger glasses. I&#8217;m not too fond of labels myself, as long as it&#8217;s glaringly obvious: Space-ships go to sci-fi, magic swords and dragons go to fantasy, &#8220;Memoirs of the Last 5 Presidents&#8221; go either to fiction or horror :P Thing is, I &#8220;need&#8221; some kind of label, just to be able to find my books again. Sure, *I* sort them, and I know where the &#8220;overlap&#8221; area is, too &#8211; but it helps finding that &#8220;Whatchamma-geddon by Arthur or Gene somethingorother!&#8221;</p>
<p>As to e-books, and e-readings, I&#8217;m sorry, I&#8217;m too paranoid. If it&#8217;s on paper, you can&#8217;t mess with it. I&#8217;d like to be able to read the exact same story 10 years from now that I read 10 years ago. Don&#8217;t change the words due to some political correctness stuff. West Side Story: the song contains the word &#8220;gay&#8221;, I don&#8217;t care what it means today, I know what it meant back then, and don&#8217;t you dare change it because of whatever!</p>
<p>Perhaps I read too much Orwell when I was too young :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aelinna</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41334</link>
		<dc:creator>Aelinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad you posted this, maybe could have been 50% the size ;)

I would say the problem is not in the categorisation, but those that agree to be bound by them. Check out the nonfiction sometime, for a voracious reader it&#039;s not all dry. I really enjoyed &quot;Why Children Fail&quot; from the Education section, and I have Robbins&#039; Pathology (although that is bloody hard going for a layman like me). I feel obliged to namecheck Robin Hobb for quality fantasy and Charles Stross + Greg Egan for scifi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you posted this, maybe could have been 50% the size ;)</p>
<p>I would say the problem is not in the categorisation, but those that agree to be bound by them. Check out the nonfiction sometime, for a voracious reader it&#8217;s not all dry. I really enjoyed &#8220;Why Children Fail&#8221; from the Education section, and I have Robbins&#8217; Pathology (although that is bloody hard going for a layman like me). I feel obliged to namecheck Robin Hobb for quality fantasy and Charles Stross + Greg Egan for scifi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slack</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41295</link>
		<dc:creator>Slack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 05:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i read through this entire thing,  i am an avid reader (16) and at the age of 12 my dad introduced me to some of the greats! stephen donaldson (new book coming out in a few months yay!) Asimov and his foundation series and Heinlein with Stranger and Job. it still shocks me that people dont recognize the name asimov despite the fact that half of them probably watched irobot, anyway great article and i completely understand where your coming from,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read through this entire thing,  i am an avid reader (16) and at the age of 12 my dad introduced me to some of the greats! stephen donaldson (new book coming out in a few months yay!) Asimov and his foundation series and Heinlein with Stranger and Job. it still shocks me that people dont recognize the name asimov despite the fact that half of them probably watched irobot, anyway great article and i completely understand where your coming from,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zahraah</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41282</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahraah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They could also fit some of ringo in the erotic section too :)  Writers get taught to write for their audience, so the labels are as much for labling the writer as well as the market/reading audience,  I like urban fantasy ( horror in most chain stores) , and have been reading space opera/sci fic/spec fic/miliary sci fic.  Theres a difference between SF  &amp; SF Science fiction or speculative fiction.  Die hard Science fiction readers will debate to great lengths as to what qualifies a book/story to be entitled to that label.  I would say most labels are just publishers trying to keep it neat and tidy, maybe it should be much like music has become  Eg Metal = Heavy metal, Power Metal, New Metal, Thrash Metal,  doom metal, Black metal, Viking metal, Folk metal and so many others.  I think we need some labeling so we are able to find what genre we know what we like,  but it needs to of broader scope then what we see now.  ( and not just like the mills and boon labels. I&#039;m gonna punlish the first &quot; Thrash Spec Fic&quot;  novel or &quot;Power Mystery&quot; book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could also fit some of ringo in the erotic section too :)  Writers get taught to write for their audience, so the labels are as much for labling the writer as well as the market/reading audience,  I like urban fantasy ( horror in most chain stores) , and have been reading space opera/sci fic/spec fic/miliary sci fic.  Theres a difference between SF  &amp; SF Science fiction or speculative fiction.  Die hard Science fiction readers will debate to great lengths as to what qualifies a book/story to be entitled to that label.  I would say most labels are just publishers trying to keep it neat and tidy, maybe it should be much like music has become  Eg Metal = Heavy metal, Power Metal, New Metal, Thrash Metal,  doom metal, Black metal, Viking metal, Folk metal and so many others.  I think we need some labeling so we are able to find what genre we know what we like,  but it needs to of broader scope then what we see now.  ( and not just like the mills and boon labels. I&#8217;m gonna punlish the first &#8221; Thrash Spec Fic&#8221;  novel or &#8220;Power Mystery&#8221; book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathlar</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41275</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathlar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice rant, i like those random non WoW things.
I started reading when i was 4, and my tastes are similar to yours, i read almost everything and love doing so. It feels weird, but since i got my Kindle i have almost never got a &quot;paper&quot; book again, i just love that piece of plastic that let me take all my books around without carrying too much weight.

What i love most of reading a lot of different stuff is that i never know where the next real gem is going to come. I&#039;m not talking about fun books, there are a lot of those and they are nice, but the incredible ones that make you think. I love anything with a decent story if it has great characters in it, where someone puts it in a book store? i don&#039;t care much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice rant, i like those random non WoW things.<br />
I started reading when i was 4, and my tastes are similar to yours, i read almost everything and love doing so. It feels weird, but since i got my Kindle i have almost never got a &#8220;paper&#8221; book again, i just love that piece of plastic that let me take all my books around without carrying too much weight.</p>
<p>What i love most of reading a lot of different stuff is that i never know where the next real gem is going to come. I&#8217;m not talking about fun books, there are a lot of those and they are nice, but the incredible ones that make you think. I love anything with a decent story if it has great characters in it, where someone puts it in a book store? i don&#8217;t care much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ech</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41258</link>
		<dc:creator>ech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;You go looking for those books, and half the time you’ll find some are in the science fiction section, because he’s a “science fiction writer”. He was tagged and bagged, and so that’s where his books get shoved.&lt;/i&gt;

The topic of pen names came up on John Scalzi&#039;s blog the other day and one reason some writers use a pen name is to get around this bucketing. So Ringo could have chosen a pen name, like &quot;John Starkey&quot; for his military fiction. Of course, if it came from Baen, it might still have been shelved in SFF. One other reason to use a pen name is if you go from writing say, hard Sf space operas to feminist high fantasy, you might want a pen name so your regular readers don&#039;t freak out.

&lt;i&gt;Do mystery authors try to write in a formulaic way so their book qualifies to be labeled a ‘mystery’?&lt;/i&gt;

According to a friend, yes. Mysteries are as sub-bucketed as SFF,  maybe more so. There is a local mystery book store here in town, and they have a sheet at the register with a bunch of categories and authors who write for the category.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You go looking for those books, and half the time you’ll find some are in the science fiction section, because he’s a “science fiction writer”. He was tagged and bagged, and so that’s where his books get shoved.</i></p>
<p>The topic of pen names came up on John Scalzi&#8217;s blog the other day and one reason some writers use a pen name is to get around this bucketing. So Ringo could have chosen a pen name, like &#8220;John Starkey&#8221; for his military fiction. Of course, if it came from Baen, it might still have been shelved in SFF. One other reason to use a pen name is if you go from writing say, hard Sf space operas to feminist high fantasy, you might want a pen name so your regular readers don&#8217;t freak out.</p>
<p><i>Do mystery authors try to write in a formulaic way so their book qualifies to be labeled a ‘mystery’?</i></p>
<p>According to a friend, yes. Mysteries are as sub-bucketed as SFF,  maybe more so. There is a local mystery book store here in town, and they have a sheet at the register with a bunch of categories and authors who write for the category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41253</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Eyes of the Dragon was my first experience with Stephen King, and a step away from the D&amp;D style fiction I had started to devour at age 10. 

I think the first time I ever realized that there were people out there that... I simply could not abide... was the first time I saw someone turn their nose up at Stephen King. &quot;Genre literature.&quot;  It wasn&#039;t &quot;real literature&quot; according to these people, at which point I decided that obviously these people were used to Other People not thinking for themselves.  I find Stephen King to be a fantastic storyteller. His syntax, diction, grammar, flavor text, what-have-you... is solid. I&#039;m not saying I&#039;ve loved everything he&#039;s ever written or that he is above critique... But I knew at that moment that &quot;Those People&quot; had no idea what a good story was about. 

This extended into SciFi/Fantasy (which I have also always hated having lumped together, and yet own a couple of books that fit into both)... Which, as you said, Those People have dubbed &quot;populist trash&quot;. I don&#039;t think you&#039;re overstating that factor at all.

Finding Authors In Multiple Places:  Neil Gaiman. I still couldn&#039;t stick a firm label on the books of his that I&#039;ve read. I guess it is all technically &#039;fantasy&#039;, but in a way, that&#039;s a hard stretch for me to slap that single label on things like American Gods and Neverwhere.

Aside: I would love to see a &quot;horror&quot; section in a bookstore, but I think most of them have given up on that and put it in the &quot;Science Fiction &amp; Fantasy&quot; area. I know that my local B&amp;N has. Though I can still also find Lovecraft and sometimes Derleth in the &quot;fiction&quot; section.

Libraries:  My school library in elementary school (up to 6th grade) had some serious conservative Baptist deep south issues. I watched the librarian throw away MANY fantasy novels. Including the entire? &quot;Guardians of Flame&quot; series by Joel Rosenberg. In brief, it&#039;s kind of... the old D&amp;D cartoon, as a series of novels. From Wikipedia: &quot;The series is about a group of college students who participate in a fantasy role-playing game, and are magically transported to the world of the game by their gamemaster.&quot;

These books were thrown away because they were &quot;of the Devil&quot;. In fact, much of our &quot;fiction&quot; section (they had genre stickers. SciFi/Fantasy was a sky blue sticker with a unicorn head) was treated this way. The only set of books I remember them keeping was the &quot;Enchanted Forest Chronicles&quot; - a set of books by Patricia C Wrede (Dealing with Dragons, etc) and I&#039;m still shocked they kept those!

Back to the &quot;not real literature&quot; thing... One day I decided to try out what they are calling &quot;real literature&quot; these days, and picked up a collection of stories by Rick Moody. In an interview I remember reading, Rick Moody made some kind of claim about how characterization and plot &quot;get in the way of a story&quot;. That didn&#039;t put him on the right stepping stone with me, and the horribly written slop that was his book sealed the deal. Metaphors that were more like riddles (or meant/invoked NOTHING), paragraph long details about things that never surfaced again in the story, nor had any importance even in the moment they were described and just... pretentious syntax meant to bedazzle the reader but really ended up befuddling them. And in the end, the reader is supposed to come to the conclusion that the writer is just Oh-so-better than they are, and that obviously, they are not &quot;high-brow&quot; enough to &quot;get&quot; what the author was trying to say.  Rubbish and poppycock.

&quot;Heinlein once wrote that he had it real bad; he’d read the used newspaper that was used to hold fish and chips if nothing else was available. &quot;

I am guilty of reading every shampoo bottle, every anything bottle in the bathroom while taking a bath or whatever. I am also the person who will, when conversation lags in a restaurant setting... grab the bottled and packaged condiments on the table and start reading the labels. I can&#039;t help myself.

RAMBLING COMMENTS ARE RAMBLING.

I guess the short version is: Post good. Judgmental Labeling Bad. Bear good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Eyes of the Dragon was my first experience with Stephen King, and a step away from the D&amp;D style fiction I had started to devour at age 10. </p>
<p>I think the first time I ever realized that there were people out there that&#8230; I simply could not abide&#8230; was the first time I saw someone turn their nose up at Stephen King. &#8220;Genre literature.&#8221;  It wasn&#8217;t &#8220;real literature&#8221; according to these people, at which point I decided that obviously these people were used to Other People not thinking for themselves.  I find Stephen King to be a fantastic storyteller. His syntax, diction, grammar, flavor text, what-have-you&#8230; is solid. I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;ve loved everything he&#8217;s ever written or that he is above critique&#8230; But I knew at that moment that &#8220;Those People&#8221; had no idea what a good story was about. </p>
<p>This extended into SciFi/Fantasy (which I have also always hated having lumped together, and yet own a couple of books that fit into both)&#8230; Which, as you said, Those People have dubbed &#8220;populist trash&#8221;. I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re overstating that factor at all.</p>
<p>Finding Authors In Multiple Places:  Neil Gaiman. I still couldn&#8217;t stick a firm label on the books of his that I&#8217;ve read. I guess it is all technically &#8216;fantasy&#8217;, but in a way, that&#8217;s a hard stretch for me to slap that single label on things like American Gods and Neverwhere.</p>
<p>Aside: I would love to see a &#8220;horror&#8221; section in a bookstore, but I think most of them have given up on that and put it in the &#8220;Science Fiction &amp; Fantasy&#8221; area. I know that my local B&amp;N has. Though I can still also find Lovecraft and sometimes Derleth in the &#8220;fiction&#8221; section.</p>
<p>Libraries:  My school library in elementary school (up to 6th grade) had some serious conservative Baptist deep south issues. I watched the librarian throw away MANY fantasy novels. Including the entire? &#8220;Guardians of Flame&#8221; series by Joel Rosenberg. In brief, it&#8217;s kind of&#8230; the old D&amp;D cartoon, as a series of novels. From Wikipedia: &#8220;The series is about a group of college students who participate in a fantasy role-playing game, and are magically transported to the world of the game by their gamemaster.&#8221;</p>
<p>These books were thrown away because they were &#8220;of the Devil&#8221;. In fact, much of our &#8220;fiction&#8221; section (they had genre stickers. SciFi/Fantasy was a sky blue sticker with a unicorn head) was treated this way. The only set of books I remember them keeping was the &#8220;Enchanted Forest Chronicles&#8221; &#8211; a set of books by Patricia C Wrede (Dealing with Dragons, etc) and I&#8217;m still shocked they kept those!</p>
<p>Back to the &#8220;not real literature&#8221; thing&#8230; One day I decided to try out what they are calling &#8220;real literature&#8221; these days, and picked up a collection of stories by Rick Moody. In an interview I remember reading, Rick Moody made some kind of claim about how characterization and plot &#8220;get in the way of a story&#8221;. That didn&#8217;t put him on the right stepping stone with me, and the horribly written slop that was his book sealed the deal. Metaphors that were more like riddles (or meant/invoked NOTHING), paragraph long details about things that never surfaced again in the story, nor had any importance even in the moment they were described and just&#8230; pretentious syntax meant to bedazzle the reader but really ended up befuddling them. And in the end, the reader is supposed to come to the conclusion that the writer is just Oh-so-better than they are, and that obviously, they are not &#8220;high-brow&#8221; enough to &#8220;get&#8221; what the author was trying to say.  Rubbish and poppycock.</p>
<p>&#8220;Heinlein once wrote that he had it real bad; he’d read the used newspaper that was used to hold fish and chips if nothing else was available. &#8221;</p>
<p>I am guilty of reading every shampoo bottle, every anything bottle in the bathroom while taking a bath or whatever. I am also the person who will, when conversation lags in a restaurant setting&#8230; grab the bottled and packaged condiments on the table and start reading the labels. I can&#8217;t help myself.</p>
<p>RAMBLING COMMENTS ARE RAMBLING.</p>
<p>I guess the short version is: Post good. Judgmental Labeling Bad. Bear good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kattrinsaa</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41252</link>
		<dc:creator>kattrinsaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good thought provoking post bear, 

When I have to go to the big city to work, my habit is to stop into barnes and nobles after lunch before i head back to the office. I wander around the fantasy/sci-fi, go up to the teens section, (was looking for a paperback of brisinger) and then wander through the technical section. (found a nice book on wow addon lua programming but never bought it.) 

I have bought a few books there, after being given &quot;The curse of Chalion&quot; I ended up buying &quot;Paladin of Souls&quot;, I bought paperback copies of &quot;Eragon&quot; and &quot;Eldest.&quot; Call me strange, but I refuse to buy a hardback of a part of a series when I already bought paperbacks of the predecessors. That&#039;s like buying most of a series of movies on vhs and buying the rest on dvd. I have to complete my harry potter series one of these days, I have all 7, but 3 are paperback (that I bought) and 4 were hardcover gifts..

Like you, my HS library wasnt broken down into sections other than fiction/non-fiction and reference. The public library there lacked a bit to be desired tho, all three books had already been colored in...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thought provoking post bear, </p>
<p>When I have to go to the big city to work, my habit is to stop into barnes and nobles after lunch before i head back to the office. I wander around the fantasy/sci-fi, go up to the teens section, (was looking for a paperback of brisinger) and then wander through the technical section. (found a nice book on wow addon lua programming but never bought it.) </p>
<p>I have bought a few books there, after being given &#8220;The curse of Chalion&#8221; I ended up buying &#8220;Paladin of Souls&#8221;, I bought paperback copies of &#8220;Eragon&#8221; and &#8220;Eldest.&#8221; Call me strange, but I refuse to buy a hardback of a part of a series when I already bought paperbacks of the predecessors. That&#8217;s like buying most of a series of movies on vhs and buying the rest on dvd. I have to complete my harry potter series one of these days, I have all 7, but 3 are paperback (that I bought) and 4 were hardcover gifts..</p>
<p>Like you, my HS library wasnt broken down into sections other than fiction/non-fiction and reference. The public library there lacked a bit to be desired tho, all three books had already been colored in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winterspite</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41251</link>
		<dc:creator>Winterspite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post - I had a lot of good memories from reading it.  Huzzah for John Ringo - have you read any of Larry Correia&#039;s work yet?

I&#039;ve been reading since I was crawling, or close enough as makes no difference, and I was definitely in the same boat as you.  I think I was 9 or 10 years old when I picked up a copy of Dune and read my way through it, then through the next 5  books in the series.  Very, very eye opening at the time - and I didn&#039;t even understand it all.  Reading Dune again a few years later, then a few years after THAT, I still picked up new things.

As to your first point about physical books, I was definitely on your side of the argument until recently.  (Un)fortunately, I&#039;ve been gifted with the ability to read books quickly.  If you take your average novel (say... A Hymn Before Battle), I can probably knock that out in 3-4 hours of solid, uninterrupted reading.  Maybe it takes me a little longer, but that&#039;s roughly my pace - hours.  Then plan on being in an airplane or airport for 10 hours, then having frequent downtime in the evenings for a two week business trip, then flying home... and a nook isn&#039;t a &quot;nice to have&quot; item anymore, it&#039;s a requirement.  The major downside to this of course is that I now buy TWO copies of books - hardback Baen books when they come out for my bookshelves at home, plus the eBook version to read and cart around with me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; I had a lot of good memories from reading it.  Huzzah for John Ringo &#8211; have you read any of Larry Correia&#8217;s work yet?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading since I was crawling, or close enough as makes no difference, and I was definitely in the same boat as you.  I think I was 9 or 10 years old when I picked up a copy of Dune and read my way through it, then through the next 5  books in the series.  Very, very eye opening at the time &#8211; and I didn&#8217;t even understand it all.  Reading Dune again a few years later, then a few years after THAT, I still picked up new things.</p>
<p>As to your first point about physical books, I was definitely on your side of the argument until recently.  (Un)fortunately, I&#8217;ve been gifted with the ability to read books quickly.  If you take your average novel (say&#8230; A Hymn Before Battle), I can probably knock that out in 3-4 hours of solid, uninterrupted reading.  Maybe it takes me a little longer, but that&#8217;s roughly my pace &#8211; hours.  Then plan on being in an airplane or airport for 10 hours, then having frequent downtime in the evenings for a two week business trip, then flying home&#8230; and a nook isn&#8217;t a &#8220;nice to have&#8221; item anymore, it&#8217;s a requirement.  The major downside to this of course is that I now buy TWO copies of books &#8211; hardback Baen books when they come out for my bookshelves at home, plus the eBook version to read and cart around with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jinkx</title>
		<link>http://thebigbearbutt.com/2010/08/02/writing-about-reading-genres/comment-page-1/#comment-41245</link>
		<dc:creator>jinkx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigbearbutt.com/?p=3289#comment-41245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the kind of parents that let me go to the local library and where pissed when i came home telling them that the librarian refused me a book cuz it wasnt &#039;fit for me&#039;. They gave me the gift of reading without restriction and its the most beautifull gift they ever gave me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the kind of parents that let me go to the local library and where pissed when i came home telling them that the librarian refused me a book cuz it wasnt &#8216;fit for me&#8217;. They gave me the gift of reading without restriction and its the most beautifull gift they ever gave me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
