Spoiler Free Review: Captain America the Winter Soldier


Last night I went to a midnight showing of Captain America, The Winter Soldier, and I wanted to do a quick review, no spoilers.

Quickest review: I really liked it, and I think I’m going to enjoy seeing it again. Maybe not as much as the first Thor, but more than Iron Man 2 or 3. Maybe just a touch below The Avengers. It’s a great continuation from the first Captain America and Avengers films.

I went to see the movie by myself because it’s PG-13, and I wanted to see what the action was like before letting my eleven-year old boy see it. We went to see Iron Man 3 as a family, and it turned out there were a lot more ‘people melting, on fire and exploding’ scenes than I expected from an Iron Man film. Surprise!

I’m glad I saw it, it’s a good movie. I’m also glad I didn’t take my son this go around.

No spoilers, but I’ll share a few things if you’re considering taking your children to see it.

First, this isn’t a primary-color superhero film. This isn’t Spiderman or Superman. This movie is, first and foremost, a very tight cold war technothriller involving super-spies and super-soldiers. Think more like James Bond 007 without the drinking, gambling and sex.

I’m fine with that, in fact I loved it. I’ve read the comics where The Winter Soldier was introduced, I always loved the Nick Fury, Agent of SHIELD comics, and there was a time in Marvel comics where Captain America was used as a super-spy by SHIELD as though it were a natural extension of being a super-soldier. This storyline felt very natural.

In case you love old SHIELD comics yourself, one of my favorite Marvel one-shots was a “What if…” issue where the question was asked, ‘What if Wolverine was an Agent of SHIELD?‘ It is a superb one-shot story, and if you find yourself browsing a bin of used comics, by all means look for it. It’s kick ass.

Anyway, I’m not the guy that’s going to walk in to this movie pissed because it had lots of spying and secret agent man stuff, but your kids probably won’t understand why a superhero movie has all these people in black commando outfits racing around in black Chevy suburbans shooting at each other.

Let me be clear. This film is a cold war technothriller in that there are two opposing forces with a whole lot of gray area in the middle, each is evenly matched in terms of power and influence, and they use the latest bleeding-edge technology in their attempts to gain the upper hand.

One of the strengths of this movie was in giving us two sides that could each argue their positions with passion and charisma. When you see an idiotic frothing-at-the-mouth twit ranting illiterate pseudo-Nietzschien crap, you wonder how the hell he’s got more than three people following him around, and expect two of them to be CIA plants keeping an eye on the moron.

In this film, when talking motive the speakers are able to passionately articulate their position so they sound reasonable. Caring. What they say smacks of fascism, but of the “yes, it’s fascism, but it’s okay because it’s us doing it, and you know you can trust us” kind of thing. “Oh, okay, if someone else were to say that I’d think they were a crazed would-be megalomaniac with dreams of world domination, but since it’s you saying it, we’re good.”

You can believe that the two sides here could recruit intelligent, committed people to their causes.

Bottom line, no real super-powered Loki-style colors and capes villains. It’s causes and crimes and sneaking and techno-gadgets. It’s “Trust no one” levels of super-spy.

The other thing to keep in mind, Black Widow and Nick Fury share a lot of screen time with Cap. That poster I put up there is accurate, Captain America is the star and we follow him around, but he spends a lot of time with our two other favorite super-spies. I thought it was great, gives you three kick ass stars instead of one, and let us build on their relationships.

Now for the two things that I thought were annoying.

First, we’ve got a movie starring a super-soldier that doesn’t use guns. That makes for some hard cinematic choices.

He uses his shield as both a defensive and offensive weapon, and they make a point of showing how skilled he is at unarmed combat. Through most of the movie, the action is tight and well filmed. Also, the shield matters. A lot. He’s a freaking genius in using the shield tactically, and they show it MUCH better than in the first film.

But in the first fifteen minutes, they are trying to establish that he is the ultimate bad ass. Where it went a little off was they didn’t show us his fights clearly, they used a LOT of shaky-cam and sped-up shots with weird angles to give you the impression of blistering fast movement without a clear idea of what the heck just happened.

They calm it down, but that first fifteen minutes had me worried that it was all going to be like the first Transformers movie, lots of shots of giant robot feet running by and crashing noises and falling rubble, but no clear shots of giant robots fighting.

The other thing to consider, and the main reason I’m not going to take my son to see it in the theater, is the nature of the violence.

Yes, it’s a spy movie, so there is a lot of political double-play that is going to go over his head.  Most of the plot is going to be muddy to him, so it’ll end up being a bunch of people fighting for no clear reason. That’s okay, he’s eleven and a fight is exciting for it’s own merits. How else can we explain the popularity of Dragonball Z?

But this isn’t blasters and stun guns and aliens falling down. A lot of real people get shot. There are real consequences and real tragedy and real injuries and death. All the things that make a cold war technothriller tense and exciting are present. Real people shooting at other real people, and dying.

I didn’t see any gratuitous ‘head blown off’ stuff, it’s not like that, but you can show people getting shot and have it matter without spraying guts across the room, and they do that. Most of the time when people got shot it was the ‘red blooms of color form on chest, people fall down’ level of wounding. And when superheroes get shot, they just get a little slower and their uniform gets stained, you know what I mean.

But it’s intense, and if you’ve got small children they are going to see gunfights in crowded city streets, and while you don’t specifically see the people in a bus get mowed down into hamburger, it would be easy to walk away with your mind filling in the blanks.

So in the end, like I said, I liked it a lot. I thought the acting was first rate and I’d like to see it again, but it’s not one that I’d recommend for the youngsters in your life.

That being said, I’d take my son to this one before I’d let him watch Man of Steel. At least THIS hero cares about saving people and doesn’t kill the bad guy at the end by ripping his head clean off.

Okay, that was a spoiler, granted, but it was for Man of Steel, so it doesn’t count.

2 thoughts on “Spoiler Free Review: Captain America the Winter Soldier

  1. “A super soldier who doesn’t use guns.” You mean besides all the times we saw him use guns in Cap 1 and Avengers? 😉

    I agree it’s a great movie and one of the things I like about the Marvel Cinema is how they capture different themes and genres for different heroes. Most obvious example is when Hulk enrages on the HeliCarrier in Avengers and suddenly we’re in a survival horror flick.

    Cloak and Dagger stuff works for Cap partly because it’s not his natural element. He’s a star spangled freedom fighter in a very shades of grey world, and when he’s uncomfortable it allows us to be uncomfortable, too.

    I’m curious about how this film will impact the Agents of SHIELD TV show.


  2. Hah! You hit publish about five minutes before the start of the showing I attended. I agree, great film, great addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.


Comments are closed.